The absurdist writers have preferred to write in a language empty of content to turn out to be the suitable depiction of a motionless life they use language as an ineffective means to express one"s thinking, to understand the world, or to define one"s self. The use of language by the absurd playwrights analyses the limits of language as a way of communication and as a tool of thought because there might be no fixed meanings in a universe deprived of standards, values and merits. Speech is, certainly, the evidence of being and a way of opposing silence, loneliness and passing away, and it is considered as human being"s distinctive legacy.
It studies not only the cul-de-sacs of comprehending the stimulus of humans, but also demonstrates the issue of communication between people. Language outlines human character as a method of reassurance. The study provides an answer to the question of whether language in Waiting for Godot can be a means of expressing all what the characters what to say.
It explores the core of language and its complexity. This research aims to study the significance of the language in Waiting for Godot.
0 kommentar(er)
